I had the opportunity to see growth of poker in our country since its inception in casinos, you may not see its history from the tournament at the Sheraton, but certainly I could see when they first released at the Casino Majestic.
Majestic Casino Lima
2005 opens its doors, with satellites into the WSOP, from 100 soles, 1 in 10 classified the $ 300 tournament, and this in turn, classified the $ 1,000. He was 19 years, winning one of the S/100 soles and go iliminado $ 300 in coconuts. Eyes should be clear that were played with 1,500 chips and blinds 50-100. Look how such a structure.
2006 Casino Miami, with 100 soles turbo tournament with rebuys, 3mil starting chips, double 7k 200, started in blinds 50-100, 30 big blinds.
memory fails me but I assume it was in 2006 that the Atlantic had opened and finally poker others.
What I liked was reading some comments on one page of Chile where they talk about the structure and quality of dealers. Http://www.masdepoker.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=958
And the most common salvageable and what happens even in Peru is:
"When making decisions, the dealers are quite different procedures and commit" atrocities "and no errors. This is not their fault is the way how he was taught."
"A good dealer poker is that players who are on the table are not aware of his presence, and what I've seen is just the opposite, because this person makes the game takes longer, then procedures" , which I see in many casinos which are delayed, talk to the players, etc.
"We have to balance the initial stack and the blinds over a reasonable time they play that gives value to the investment they made." I've played tournaments with wells and $ 350mil all had less than 10 big blinds. About
tournament directors that not many in Peru:
"First cool head, having very much about the rules and taking into account even more, that the rules are not absolute, you have to use common sense to interpret rules according to the particular situation in which the problem arises, you have to channel the intention of the player, analyze whether it was an honest mistake or not, discuss the circumstances. For example, a dealer will throw your hand to a player, and if they are the only cards in the muck, I'm going to give back, if there are more cards and turns, "no gentlemen possibility is a responsibility to care for their cards. " If I can fix a bug, I'm going to settle within the logic, common sense is all that a tournament director should have. A tournament director who tries to be too legalistic is wrong, the rules are to bend a little under the circumstances "
And finally a comment that I liked even though sometimes I've seen horrors:
In Latin America for LAPT me without doubt, and within these, a consensus, Peru, infrastructure, the time it took, the preparation of the dealers, technicians, maintenance, people who helped us move tables, everything was perfect, everything was in place when we need it, never heard a "can not" or "wait", everything happened as you say Chileans "Altira."
Slds
0 comments:
Post a Comment